Independent scorecards · Small teams
We score automation tools so small teams pick with evidence — not vibes.
410 out of 500 possible points. Named weights. No hidden winner.
How the score works
We score automation tools for small teams so you can pick one.
Each tool is rated 1–5 on named criteria. Each criterion has a weight; the weights add up to 100. Total = rating × weight, summed. Perfect score is 500. Make’s 410/500 is 410 out of 500 possible points on that card.
Higher is a better fit for small teams on our criteria — not “best tool forever.” These two cards use different criteria, so do not compare 410 to 397.
Automation tools · Approved totals
Make vs n8n vs Zapier
410 · 368 · 353 out of 500. Same criteria sheet.
At a glance
Choose if
Approved totalsHow scoring works1–5 × weight · max 500
Ops hubs · Approved totals · separate criteria
Notion vs Coda vs Airtable
397 · 390 · 348 out of 500. Different criteria — not comparable to 410.
FAQ
What does 410/500 mean?
Each tool is rated 1–5 on named criteria. Each criterion has a weight; the weights add up to 100. We multiply rating × weight and add them up. A perfect score is 500. Make’s 410/500 is 410 out of 500 possible points on the automation card. Higher is a better fit for small teams on our criteria — not “best tool forever.”
Why does Make lead vs n8n and Zapier?
On this card’s weighted sheet, Make totals 410/500, n8n Cloud 368/500, and Zapier 353/500. That is the cloud rank. We have published Make’s pricing cell (4 of 5, from make.com/en/pricing, 2026-09-07). Other 1–5 cells stay inside the totals for now.
Why isn’t n8n Self-hosted ranked with the cloud products?
382/500 is scored on the same 1–5 × weight sheet so you can compare the number. It is not a fourth cloud SaaS seat and is not mixed into the cloud #1 / #2 / #3 rank. You own uptime, upgrades, and backups.
What do approved totals mean?
The /500 totals are approved; we have not published every 1–5 cell yet. This is not a final “best of 2026.” A full scorecard would also show every criterion-level cell. “Not ranked yet” means no ranking at all.
Where are the criterion-level scores?
Inside the weighted totals. We publish the /500 composites and the labelled cells we have filled (Make’s pricing is 4 of 5). Unpublished cells read “in total.” We do not back-solve them. Rules live on Methodology.
Is there a separate Make vs Zapier or Make vs n8n scorecard?
No second scorecard. Approved totals stay on this automation card. A thin Make vs Zapier guide cites 410/500 vs 353/500 only. Pairwise n8n reads still jump to Choose-if here.
What do the Canada notes actually say?
Operator notes, not counsel. Zapier: CAD billing available, GST/HST on the invoice line. n8n Cloud: EU Frankfurt named — not Canadian residency. n8n Self-hosted: runtime sits where you put it. Make: CAD/GST not inferred from the pricing score.
Who this is for
Operators, not spectators
- Solo operators and small teams wiring Make, n8n, Zapier, Notion, or agent tooling.
- People who want the workings, not a confident “#1 pick” with no scores shown.
- Readers who want original tables and named weights, in English, wherever they run the stack.
Trust signals you can inspect
Published methodology
Criteria, weights, and what we will not score are on one page. See Methodology.
Affiliate disclosure
Make Partner is live (pc=stackscorecard). We may earn a commission. Affiliate disclosure.
Labels stay honest
Automation card: Make 410/500, n8n Cloud 368/500, Zapier 353/500. Ops-hub card: Notion 397/500, Airtable 390/500, Coda 348/500 — different criteria, not comparable. Hands-on test on the ops-hub card is still pending (docs only).
Original tables
Named criteria and weighted totals. No invented testimonials.
Canadian notes when they matter. CAD, GST/HST, and PIPEDA / Law 25 are spice, not the TAM.
Not for
- Enterprise RFP theatre or “AI tools of the week” listicles.
- Anyone looking for a hidden ranking we have not published. There isn’t one.
- Vendors hoping a commission will move a score. It will not.